Hi again !
Al, thank you for your response.
What about the JDBC auxiliary ? It would release me from setting up the
remote cache, and to create another web app for the startup, right ?
I still have a doubt, it will work like de remote cache ? I mean, when a
node stores a value, It will be visible for other caches ?
I see another little problem, de values are stored in BLOB fileds into
the database, but I will store just Doubles.
Thanx again for your time !
Martin.
El 17/06/10 03:59, Al Forbes escribió:
Hi Martin,
Sounds like you need a remote cache - each local cache updates the remote
cache. If something is not in the local cache, then the query is sent to the
remote cache. If the remote cache is updated, all other caches are notified
of the update.
http://jakarta.apache.org/jcs/RemoteAuxCache.html
Regards
Al
2010/6/16 Martín Eduardo Bradaschia<martin.bradasc...@intercomgi.net>
Hi there !
I need some help in this scenario.
I was using jcs to cache data in our application. It used a disk auxiliary
and all was going well, but now ...
The application grew up, we have 8 nodes working in cluster now. Each node
calculates values (it takes about 2 minutes to calculate each value because
of internet access, text parsing, etc). So we need that each calculated
value be stored in a shared cache to avoid the same calculation in other
nodes. High performance is not a priority, sharing is !
The question is What settings would you recommend ?
Thnx in advance !
--
Martin Eduardo Bradaschia
Intercomgi Argentina
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jcs-users-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jcs-users-h...@jakarta.apache.org
--
Martin Eduardo Bradaschia
Intercomgi Argentina
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jcs-users-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jcs-users-h...@jakarta.apache.org
