We do need to release the current temp build as 1.4. Then we can get rid of concurrent and make a minor release. After that, perhaps we can move to using 1.5 features.
Aaron --- On Fri, 6/25/10, Al Forbes <forbes...@googlemail.com> wrote: > From: Al Forbes <forbes...@googlemail.com> > Subject: Re: JCS vs ehcache > To: "JCS Users List" <jcs-users@jakarta.apache.org> > Date: Friday, June 25, 2010, 8:33 AM > Hi, > > Just my 2 cents worth... > > JCS is generally stable enough for most people, so > additional features are > not really that important. JCS has been proven in (really) > high-volume > applications. > > That said, there is not really any active development, and > there are a few > temporary releases waiting for a more formal Apache style > release. The JCS > source base is still based on JDK 1.3, so some of the > ehcache sugar features > like REST, XML, JSON are unlikely to be released anytime > soon. These > features are all relatively simple to implement in > >JDK1.5. There is also > the dependency on concurrent.jar which could be dropped if > JDK 1.5 was used. > > ehcache seems to making progress and their web site > definitely makes looks a > lot more interesting. I have not looked at ehcache in the > last two years, so > I can't say much about ehcache performance. > > I hope that helps... > > Regards > Al > > > On 24 June 2010 21:19, Mike Wertheim <m...@hyperreal.org> > wrote: > > > I need to add a cache to my java app, and I've > narrowed down the > > selection to either JCS or ehcache. > > > > ehcache seems to be doing fairly regular releases, but > it looks like > > the most recent JCS release was over a year ago. > So I'm wondering if > > JCS is being actively maintained. (And if JCS is > not being actively > > maintained, I'm wondering if this is a concern for any > of you.) > > > > Second, does anyone have experience with both ehcache > and JCS? > > Perhaps you used ehcache on a project at one > organization and used JCS > > on a project at another organization? Or perhaps > you migrated from > > one to the other? If so, I'd love to hear if > there are significant > > pros or cons for either package. > > > > > > Thanks! > > Mike Wertheim > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jcs-users-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: jcs-users-h...@jakarta.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: jcs-users-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: jcs-users-h...@jakarta.apache.org
