Paul Kinnucan a �crit :
> > I installed XEmacs/NT, but unfortunately I could not use it as a
> >replacement for Emacs/NT, because it does not handle correctly the
> >java/javaw : Using java displays a shell (which is ok, but not useful),
> >while javaw does not, but the stdout is not directed to the xemacs
> >buffer (ie. I use System.err.println() to trace/debug some methods of my
> >programs, and nothing prints). Emacs has the correct behaviour : javaw
> >does not pop up the shell, and the standard output is in the buffer.
> Yes, this is the behavior that I experienced when I evaluated a beta
> version of NT/XEmacs. Supposedly this has been fixed but I don't know where
> to get a beta with the fix to try it out.
I got, some days ago, the last beta snapshot (since that was
advertised in the XEmacs/NT list), that is b15, but experienced the same
behavior as before. Unfortunately. This is the last problem that
prevents me from using XEmacs/NT.
--
Rodrigo.
Mes propos ne sont pas | #include <disclaimer>
ceux de mon employeur | Socrate: "vous dites que j'ai bu quoi ?"