I'd switch over to FSF emacs on Unix in a minute, if I didn't have the same
set of problems with FSF emacs on NT ?
Could you provide a supported platform list for the beta ? It sounds like
it must be FSF emacs version ? 20.3 ? on Unix or win98 ? But no version of
Xemacs on Unix or FSF emacs on NT ?
I'm sure this sounds like a complaint, but I'm really just trying to use
what ever version is supported.
Thanks for all the help.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Kinnucan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 1999 12:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: JDE-2.1.6b7 Available...
>
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> For new JDE features, like JDEBug, you're better off with Emacs because
> that's the system that I use for development. I'd be happy to switch to
> XEmacs, but it doesn't run well on Windows 95, which is the plaform I use.
> Generally, my lowest priority and the last thing that I do is to ensure
> that what works for Emacs works for XEmacs.
>
> Of course, I welcome bug fixes from dedicated XEmacs users. So, if you're
> an XEmacs user and want to speed the time when JDEBug is fully functional
> on XEmacs, please feel free to dig into my code, find out where it breaks
> on XEmacs, and send the patches to the new JDE patches mailing list,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll incorporate them into the JDE
> just as fast
> as I get them.
>
> Paul
>
