> As it turns out, this "hack" makes f a prefix key, which is not
> what you want. I have since discovered that keybindings are
> additive.
>
Yes, I noticed that. I lost my '[]'-keys!! ;)
> I don't think you can use minor modes to control keybindings.
>
Yes, you can. After reading the elisp manual I think there are two ways
to go: either using overriding-local-map or having a special minor mode.
What do you think?
>From node "Active Keymaps" in the elisp manual:
"The variable `overriding-local-map', if non-`nil', specifies another
local keymap that overrides the buffer's local map and all the minor
mode keymaps.
All the active keymaps are used together to determine what command to
execute when a key is entered. Emacs searches these maps one by one, in
order of decreasing precedence, until it finds a binding in one of the
maps. The procedure for searching a single keymap is called "key
lookup"; see *Note Key Lookup::.
Normally, Emacs first searches for the key in the minor mode maps, in
the order specified by `minor-mode-map-alist'; if they do not supply a
binding for the key, Emacs searches the local map; if that too has no
binding, Emacs then searches the global map. However, if
`overriding-local-map' is non-`nil', Emacs searches that map first,
before the global map.
Since every buffer that uses the same major mode normally uses the same
local keymap, you can think of the keymap as local to the mode. A change
to the local keymap of a buffer (using `local-set-key', for example) is
seen also in the other buffers that share that keymap."
/John
--
LM/ERA/LVA/KD John Olsson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ericsson Radio Systems AB, Box 1248, S-581 12 Linkoping
-------------------------------------------------------------
Phone: +46 13 321070 ECN: 868 1070 Fax: +46 13 287370
-------------------------------------------------------------
I was doing object-oriented assembly when I was 1 year old...
For some reason my mom insists on calling it "Playing with blocks"
