At 10:02 AM 11/27/00 -0500, you wrote: >>>> Paul Kinnucan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> seems to think that: >>Hi Eric, >> >>Some further checking shows that the problem is that you have defined >>semantic-overlays-at as overlays-at in Emacs and extent-at in XEmacs. >>However, extent-at and overlays-at are quite different functions. >>overlays-at returns all the overlays at the current point; extent-at >>returns the "smallest" extent at point. > [ ... ] > >If the alias for semantic-overlays-at for XEmacs were this: > > (defalias 'semantic-overlays-at > (lambda (pos) (extent-list nil pos pos))) > >does it work? I think this might do the right thing. Yes, that works. - Paul
