Klaus,
I tried filladapt (I added the keywords as you mentionned, required it =
in my .emacs after byte compiling it, turned it on) and when it is =
turned on I don't get the filling feature on javadoc anymore, whereas =
it seems that when I turn it on, the META-Q (ie. fill-paragraph) does =
nothing (ie does not wrap my lines in a javadoc comment) Do you have =
any idea of what I missed?
Can you tell me what benefits brings 'filladapt' over emacs20-7 in the =
javadoc wrapping?
Here is what I get when I use the builtin version:
/**
* Creates an empty query
* @param uid The unique identifier of the query. This uid should =
contain both the client Id and the query index. Use the =
<code>generateId</code> method to generate this Id, and the =
<code>getClientUid()<code> and <META-Q>
gets transformed into:
/**
* Creates an empty query
* @param uid The unique identifier of the query. This uid should
* contain both the client Id and the query index. Use the
* <code>generateId</code> method to generate this Id, and the
* <code>getClientUid()<code> and
What I would dream of having done automatically is the following:
/**
* Creates an empty query
* @param uid The unique identifier of the query. This uid =
should contain
* both the client Id and the query index. Use the =
<code>generateId</code>
* method to generate this Id, and
Do you know if 'filladapt' can be configured to do such formatting?
Many thanks,
Guillaume.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 1:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: AW: Paragraph filling...
>=20
>=20
> I recommend using filladapt.el (get it from http://wonderworks.com/)=20
> which does a much better job of filling than the standard one.
>=20
> After installing this package you can modify the variable=20
> 'filladapt-token-table'
> like follows (add these elements to the variable):
>=20
> ("@param[ \t]" bullet)
> ("@see[ \t]" bullet)
> ("@return[ \t]" bullet)
> ("@exception[ \t]" bullet)
>=20
> I=B4m sure you are able to add further javadoc-keywords if you=20
> need them :-)
>=20
> After that all your JAVADOC comments wil be filled correct.
>=20
> Hope this helps,
> Klaus
