Karel Sprenger, senior solution specialist
COMPAQ, Professional Services
Phone: +31(030)283 4542 Home: +31(020) 670 0942
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Memory fault -- core...uh...um...core... Oh dammit, I forget!"
-----Original Message-----
From: Berndl, Klaus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 16:29
To: 'Molitor, Stephen'
Cc: 'JDE'
Subject: AW: Suggestion about jde-complete-at-point* commands.>I agree! Although having the parameter types printed out is occasionally
>useful,
>most of the time I just want the method name inserted, with the cursor
>positioned
>between the parenthesis.I second this suggestion!
Klaus
Steve Molitor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Chastan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 2:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Suggestion about jde-complete-at-point* commands.
Hello all,
I'm using JDE (with ECB) very intensively and I have a suggestion about
the jde-complete-at-point* commands:
1) First I think that it is not useful to have several times the
same method with different signatures in the menu because this increases
dramaticaly the menu size and then it is not very efficient to scroll in
it.
2) Second writing the parameter types when the method is inserted is
also very unefficient because this implies to go back, delete types and
rewrite parameters. I think that the better is to insert the opening
"(" and the closing ")" and to set the cursor between them.On a other hand providing the parameter types is very useful so the
solution could be to have an other popup that raises when the cursor is
between the "()" that shows all possible parameters types (only showing
them without allowing selection).What do you think about this suggestion ?
Is it possible to have customizable variables that disable method
signatures in menu and suppress parameter types on insertion ?
Thanks,
Eric.
