I voted my JDEbug preference ... thanks for putting it up ... a cool site
too!
On December 30, 2001 08:11 pm, you wrote:
> Milan Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > J�rgen Jatzkowski writes:
> > > > Hi,
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > Paul Kinnucan writes:
> > >
> > > No. However, you should be aware that JDEbug is of alpha quality.
> > > It has not received much attention over the last two years because
> > > JDE users seemed more interested in other things like Ant support,
> > > hierarchical projects, and field and method completion.
> > >
> > > I am now starting to devote most of my time to debugger support
> > > so the situation should improve. My first priority is to provide
> > > solid support for jdb because jdb is a more mature, though less
> > > capable, debugger. I then plan to work on JDEbug.
> >
> > I was wondering what % of people here use jdb vs JDEBug (not that I would
> > want my personal preference to JDEBug to affect your priorities).
>
> Funny you should mention that :)
>
> http://relativity.yi.org/website/vote/1009760418/
>
> > JDEBug, even with some the quirks, was the main reason I started using
> > JDE as a "full-circle" development environment, apart from using emacs to
> > edit Java files. I am glad the debugging environment will improve.
>
> <snip/>
>
> Yes. I agree it is pretty cool.
