Mathew Rippa writes:
 > Yes, I have also seen this (with JDE2.2.9beta9) and confirmed it is a paren 
 > mismatch/imbalance.  I have JDE2.2.9beta8 still at work and this is not a 
 > problem.
 > 
 
I have not experienced this problem. If you send me 
a file that reliably reproduces the problem, I'll investigate.
I can't think of any changes from beta 8 to beta 9 that
would cause this. It may be a problem with the latest semantic.

- Paul

Reply via email to