Well, one out of two ain't bad ... filladapt did solve the initial problem, but I'm still left with the problem that when my comment begins at the start of the line then the comment stays at the beginning of the line even if I attempt to intent using c-indent-command.
I read through bits of the cc-mode stuff but got rather confused with the number of options - is there a simple setting whereby comments within a class that start at the beginning of a line are indented to the same depth as the method and variable comment strings? Toby Paul Kinnucan wrote: > Hi, > > Install filladapt (see http://cc-mode.sourceforge.net/filladapt.php > for instructions on how to do this) and comments will wrap correctly. > > - Paul > > M-q (c-Toby Ferguson writes: > > I have noticed this too, so you're not alone (if that's any comfort!) > > > > (kind of) associated with this is the fact that the if the /* characters are at >the beginning of a line subsequent 'indent-for-modes' don't indent the comment, but >treat it as if its a class comment. Not > > sure if this is correct behaviour, but I seem to remember things were'n't always >this way. > > > > Toby > > > > Erwin Achermann wrote: > > > > > Hi *, > > > > > > I fail to configure my java editor to do what I (and presumably you guys too) >expect. I am pretty sure this is a matter of configuration, but I don't know what >variable(s) I should tweak. > > > > > > I'm using JDEE (in standard configuration) Abbrev-mode and autofill-mode are on. > > > Now here is what I observe: > > > editing a comment starting with /** or with /* leads to the following line >breaking: > > > > > > /** Calculates the maximal allowable drag distance for this column > > > * which is always larger than the other one which is what > > > is really interesting > > > > > > */ > > > > > > /* asdf asdf asdklj asdklfj asdflkj asdf lkj asdfkl asdfj dflkj > > > * adf ljasdf laksdfj lkdf lkjasdf lkj daf lk l jasdflkj asdflkj > > > fasdf asdfk asdf > > > > > > */ > > > > > > Note that the first auto-line wrap is doing exactly the right thing (correct >indent and correct prefix, which seems preconfigured nicely to ' * ') , but why is >the third line not prefixed with the ' * '. > > > The funny thing is, that c-fill-paragraph (bound on M-q) would be wrapping a >prefixing correctly. > > > The annoying thing is that in the third line the code-abbrevs get reactivated >(writing by is expanded to byte, writing for takes me to the for-loop-template...) > > > > > > Question: am I the only living with that situation? If so, how can I have >auto-fill mode prefixing all the comment lines properly and not only the first one? > > > > > > Thanks for any clue > > > Erwin > >
