On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 16:31 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Looks like there's no easy way to disable these, short of either > > completely disabling the semantic incremental parser or of redefining > > working-temp-message to be a no-op. Is there a major disadvantage to > > doing either of those? > > I would expect that. The key now is to find out what editing situation causes > it to throw the error, and to get a stack trace from it next time it occurs. > If there is a way to narrow it down, that would be useful.
I've rarely seen the error messages, so I'm fine with those happening rarely. But the other messages aren't error messages; semantic-edits-incremental-parser-1 calls working-temp-message for a lot of "informative" messages. There should be a flag that tells it not to display those, unless you're debugging semantic or happen to care. Raul
