>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Landes <lan...@mailc.net> writes:
Paul> My thinking is that maven will be a dependency. JDEE
Paul> supporting ant, maven, javac compilations is one huge
Paul> contributing reason for its bloat.
You mean drop ant/javac support? That would be a no-no in my mind. I
need all three :-) The ant support is, IMHO, fantastic.
Maven actually "works" for me right now, though I have to set up my
prj.el file manually. In my init.el I do
(require 'jde)
(require 'compile)
(add-to-list 'compilation-error-regexp-alist 'maven)
(add-to-list 'compilation-error-regexp-alist-alist
'(maven "\\(^/.+?\\):\\[\\([0-9]+\\),\\([0-9]+\\)\\].*"
1 2 3))
since Maven, unlike ant, does not support an -emacs flag. Then in my
prj.el file (at the same level as pom.xml) I add something like
(setq compile-command
"mvn -f ~/path/to/pom.xml compile assembly:single")
and off I go with M-x compile.
If JDEE would build my prj.el from pom.xml I would have everything I
need (and there are *many* such .el files I've found around the
interwebs, I beliee we just need to get a reliable version integrated).
Cheers!
Shyamal
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET
Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost.
Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1
_______________________________________________
jdee-devel mailing list
jdee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jdee-devel
