W dniu 2015-07-15 18:28, Paul Landes napisał(a): > JDEE2 (next gen) has been selected as the fork given the popularity of > keeping the name. Why you want to change the name? What's wrong with the old one? There's no reason to do that.
> I'd like to keep the emacs binding namespace. Currently everything is > `jde-' since the original name was "JDE" until Sun lawyers made us > change the name. > > The more different the namespace the better. Here are a few ideas: Why better? Is something wrong with "jde-" prefix? > I'd also like to separate as much as possible so I think we should > create a separate repo. > Thoughts? IMHO only if you want to create completely separate project. However, as I've said before, without someone driving the project it won't work. It's easy to start yet another new dead OSS project, but it takes real effort to develop it for longer period of time (years?). Don't get me wrong - I'm not discouraging you. I just state my concerns, based on what anyone can see: people start new projects all the time. Most of them are dead before release 1. The same happens in companies when someone decides to rewrite a system. It very often fails. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud. GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business. Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today. https://www.gigenetcloud.com/ _______________________________________________ jdee-devel mailing list jdee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jdee-devel
