Thanks, Eric.  I'll see if I can get your patch working with my system.
Best,
David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric M. Ludlam [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 4:29 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [jdee-users] Flatten/filter the Classes imenu?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This may be the difference between senator-jump (what used to be bound
> to c-c , j, and semantic-complete-jump-local, which is now bound to
c-c
> , j.
> 
> The algorithm for all these bits are a bit naive in that they just
pull
> up all the tags and offer them up.
> 
> If there is a specific type of filter that you (collectively) want, it
> isn't that hard to implement.  The semantic completion engine is
> architected with 'collectors' and 'displayors'.  It sounds like all
> that is needed is a new collector type.
> 
> I've attached a starter patch for what I'm guessing is the feature you
> want.  Please tune it and let me know if it does what you are looking
> for.
> 
> Eric
> 
> On 05/12/2010 05:40 AM, Tobias Gerdin wrote:
> > Den Tue, 11 May 2010 09:42:04 -0700
> > skrev Re: [jdee-users] Flatten/filter the Classes imenu?:
> >
> >> Thanks, Eric.  Yes, the keystroke C-c , j is great, though it
> suffers
> >> from too many hits.  One of my Java files has 1200+ matches (tags),
> >> and that's not atypical.  Many of those are the import statements,
> >> which I'll never want to navigate to.  Many others are method
> >> parameters, which I'll also never want to navigate to.
> >
> > I use Debian JDEE 2.3.5.1 (based on cedet1.0pre4, I believe) and
> often
> > make use of senator-jump (which I've bound to C-c j in JDE mode)
> while
> > navigating inside a class. For me the set of completions does not
> > include method parameters (which I agree would not be that useful)
so
> > it usually works well even in fairly large classes. I find it useful
> > that it also allows jumping to instance variables (but the import
> > statements could probably have been omitted, I agree).
> >
> > -Tobias
> >
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > --------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jdee-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jdee-users
> >

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
jdee-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jdee-users

Reply via email to