If you scroll down that page, you will see text style, font family, etc. being
required attributes. Yes, CSS :-)
-David Waite
Jens Alfke wrote:
> On Friday, April 6, 2001, at 09:44 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
> As you can see there is support for <em> instead of the evil <i>,
> <strong> instead of <b>, etc.
>
> Yes, although qualified with "this generally means..." and "most clients should
>recognize this as..." As I recall, there were always differences between how browsers
>interpreted these. But I suppose if everyone implementing HTML support in Jabber
>clients is cribbing from this particular document, they'll all interpret these tags
>the same way :-)
>
> Bold and italic are nice, but this still leaves open the issue of fonts, point sizes
>and colors. Otherwise it's a flashback to 1993 and Mosaic 1.0.
>
> At this point I'm planning to use <em> and <strong> but also use <u> and <font> as
>necessary. (And I'll parse <b> and <i> if I receive 'em.) Cellphones can just ignore
>them.
>
> -Jens
_______________________________________________
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
