> Again, I disagree. The Jabber architecture is very much like SMTP, and > SMTP servers have been handling "in-band" file transfers for decades. > Even huge ISPs and mail services accept file enclosures, although they > may impose limits on the file size. Yes, but SMTP servers have never pretended to be "instant". If I'm running an INSTANT messaging server (which I am), I want the traffic to be as lightweight as reasonable so that processing and delivery remains as INSTANT as possible. Todd. _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
- [JDEV] File transfer and Jabber Rob Kooper
- Re: [JDEV] File transfer and Jabber Mathew Johnston
- Re: [JDEV] File transfer and Jabber (summary) Rob Kooper
- Re: [JDEV] File transfer and Jabber Jens Alfke
- Re: [JDEV] File transfer and Jabber Iain Shigeoka
- Re: [JDEV] File transfer and Jabber Jens Alfke
- RE: [JDEV] File transfer and Jabber C Wegrzyn
- Re: [JDEV] File transfer and Jabber mark
- Re: [JDEV] File transfer and Jabber Iain Shigeoka
- Re: [JDEV] File transfer and Jabber mark
- Re: [JDEV] File transfer and Jabber Todd Bradley
- Re: [JDEV] File transfer and Jabber Jens Alfke
- Re: [JDEV] File transfer and Jabber Jens Alfke
- Re: [JDEV] File transfer and Jabber Peter Sparago
