That is not a karma problem..
your karma settings are rather high, and would not interfere with a data chunk that
size..
(incidentally, you can "turn off" karma all together by just setting <dec>0</dec>)
most likely, if you are SURE that you do not have bad XML, and all of your tags are
UTF-8
encoded.. you are hitting an internal node size limit.. which I thought was somewhere
around
500K bytes, but that might have been changed somewhere along the line... I can't look
into
it right now, but I'll take a look, and see if I can find out what the max node size is
now adays.. =]
Happy Hunting!
Keith
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 09:46:42AM -0400, Peter Sparago wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am fairly new to Jabber (since about Feb 1) but I must say, It ROCKS! I am
>designing a P2P system that uses Jabber as one of the information transports. In
>addition to normal chat messaging, we are using Jabber messaging to transfer large
>amounts of XML data (using an 'x' namespace) between Jabber users. The 'x' XML data
>will probably be in the 30K - 300K range. I am able to send a 6K packet without any
>trouble, the packet I am having trouble with is 60K.
>
> We are using Jabber 1.4.1. I've adjusted the Karma settings as follows:
>
> <karma>
> <heartbeat>2</heartbeat>
> <init>64</init>
> <max>64</max>
> <inc>6</inc>
> <dec>1</dec>
> <penalty>-3</penalty>
> <restore>64</restore>
> </karma>
>
>
> When I send the problem packet I get the following from Jabber:
>
> <stream:error xmlns="http://etherx.jabber.org/streams";>Invalid XML</stream:error>
>
> And then I get the following Java program exception:
>
> Exception processing results: java.net.SocketException: Connection aborted by
>peer: socket write error
>
> I have checked the message packet that Jabber is complaining about by running the
>XML through a couple of different XML checkers. The XML (as far as I can tell) is
>valid. I'm assuming that this is may be some kind of burst or buffering error.
>
> I realize that I can transmit the XML out of band, but most of our users will be
>behind firewalls and therefore the OOB approach is not going to work for us.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> peter
Keith Minkler
-------
Software Developer
Jabber.COM, Inc.
-------
PGP signature
