Another note is that resources are more and will be in the future more
descriptive than just location. Some of our talk about next gen stuff
has given resources a much stronger role of organizing the methods used
to search and discover entities.
How many of us really knew screenname, buddylist, and those other
AOLisms meant at first? Yes they are self descriptive when you think
about it, but so is resource, people just have to expand their mind and
maybe read a dictionary.
--temas
On 04 May 2001 23:04:47 -0400, Julian Missig wrote:
> The problem is that it will be referred to as resource everywhere
> else... especially as we use more and more agents and
> labels/instructions coming in from the server... then the users will
> know "location" but have no idea what the "resource" is. The point of a
> location/resource is somewhat lost if the user isn't aware of what it is
> between clients.
>
> Julian
>
> On 04 May 2001 21:55:52 -0500, Justin Mecham wrote:
> > I differ. Resources should remain as resource, since in reality, on a protocol
>level
> > that's what they are. The protocal can be implemented however you wish. This is
> > simply a client side issue. If you don't like the term resource, it's easy to
>change
> > the label for it to say "Location" :)
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > ---- Original Message ----
> > From:
> > Julian Missig
> > Date:
> > Fri 5/4/01 21:48
> > To:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc:
> > James M. Cape
> > Subject:
> > [JDEV] Renaming "Resource"
> >
> > I realize it's quite late in the game to propose such a thing... but
> > "resource" is a really confusing name. Several people with user
> > interface experience and I feel that "location" would be a better name.
> >
> > While it may become quite common to have several applications on the
> > same computer which will be accessing Jabber and thus need multiple
> > resources, I think the word "location" gets the point across more
> > quickly and would be better understood, even though the user is not
> > technically at a different physical location when they're running a
> > second client.
> >
> > Thoughts? Jer? Temas?
> >
> > Julian
> > --
> > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jdev mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> >
>
> --
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
_______________________________________________
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
