On Tuesday 15 May 2001 5:59 pm, you wrote: <snip/> > > Hmm. Yes. I think it may be nice if/when we get true formalized protocol > docs out to create compatibility tests (server and client). A client that > passes the test could use a "powered by Jabber" type of logo... It would > be up to jabber.com and the Foundation to decide if that would be the > lightbulb or another logo... > > Thoughts? > I think we'd be moving into the realm of SillyLand if we had to ask both the Foundation's and Jabber.com's permission to actually promote Jabber with a "powered by" logo. Cheers, Sean -- Sean McGlynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
- RE: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name Ted Rolle
- Re: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name Sean McGlynn
- Re: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name David Waite
- Re: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name Sean McGlynn
- Re: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name Jens Alfke
- RE: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name Dixon Canario
- RE: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name Flora Brunas
- RE: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name David Bryson
- RE: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name Dixon Canario
- Re: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name Iain Shigeoka
- Re: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name Sean McGlynn
- Re: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name Maciek Borowka
- Re: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name Julian Missig
- Re: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name Maciek Borowka
- RE: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name Gregory Graham
- RE: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name Julian Missig
- RE: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name Bill Farrell
- RE: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name temas
- Re: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name Maciek Borowka
- Re: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [JDEV] Jabber, the Name David Waite
