I think that binary XML for WAP is tailored to WML language, and so it
would not
be so efficient with another vocabulary.
I don't believe this is true. I think each "document" contains its own dictionary.
And since the jabber protocol
is sent over
raw IP
Not true; you mean TCP. Raw IP is packet-level stuff like 'ping' uses.
the first exchange from client <-> server would be a negotiation
of
the compressing scheme used. In fact you will end re-building a part of
http negotiation...
Not necessary at all. Just define a different port (5224?) for binary Jabber. This mechanism is already used to support SSL.
�Jens
