CVS code is unstable, and some major presence fixes are being worked on.
The code has very little testing, so be careful, events like this might
not be uncommon for a while.

--temas

On Sat, 2001-09-01 at 16:32, Stefan Praszalowicz wrote:
> Hi all !
> 
> I now use the CVS version of jabberd and noticed a little oddity in
> mod_presence.
> 
> To reproduce:
>       userA has userB in his roster
>       userB has userA in his roster
> 
>       login as userA
>       login as userB
> 
> -> What happens is that userA received presence from userB, but userB does
> not
>    receive presence from userA
> 
> A message like 'invalid message, no recipient' is logged and the presence (I
> understand it's a probe answer) is dropped.
> 
> The following patch corrects the problem:
> ===============================================================
> 
> --- ./old/mod_presence.c        Sat Sep  1 00:23:07 2001
> +++ ./new/mod_presence.c        Sat Sep  1 00:21:53 2001
> @@ -70,8 +70,13 @@
>              log_debug("mod_presence","probe from %s and no presence to
> return",jid_full(m->packet->from));
>          }else if(_mod_presence_notified(m->packet->from,notify))
>          {
> +            xmlnode pres;
>              log_debug("mod_presence","got a probe, responding to
> %s",jid_full(m->packet->from));
> -            js_deliver(m->si,jpacket_new(xmlnode_dup(m->s->presence)));
> +
> +            pres = xmlnode_dup(m->s->presence);
> +            xmlnode_put_attrib(pres, "to", jid_full(m->packet->from));
> +
> +            js_deliver(m->si,jpacket_new(pres));
>          }else{
>              log_debug("mod_presence","%s attempted to probe by someone not
> qualified",jid_full(m->packet->from));
> 
> ===============================================================
> 
> It seems the 'stock' jsm code has something like this but that it disappeard
> afterwise ... Anyway
> Happy jabbering
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev

PGP signature

Reply via email to