On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, David Waite wrote: > Actually, there have been several external XDB components. I don't think > there is a dependancy on the implementation of jabberd to require jsm, but > the current implementation of jsm does require it to be run within a > jabberd. >
On a similar note, can someone give me a pointer as to where to look (either within the server code, or docs that I havent found) for adding support for a new namespace for a custom app...or to code from other projects who have done that, that I might borrow/learn-from... -Matt > -David Waite > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Peter Saint-Andre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:33 AM > Subject: Re: [JDEV] C++ interface to jabberd > > > > > > External components connect over to jabberd over a TCP socket, rather > than > > > > being dynamically loaded into a jabberd process. > > > > > > Can you write XDBs and JSMs (the same thing?) that are external > > > components? > > > > External JSMs would be cool but that won't happen until we have a more > > modular server architecture -- right now JSM is very tightly coupled to > > jabberd and there's no way to de-couple them. I don't see any reason why > > you couldn't write an external XDB component but AFAIK no one has done so > > yet. > > > > Peter > > > > _______________________________________________ > > jdev mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > > > > _______________________________________________ > jdev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
