> A agree - that is a horrible way. I think there is a better one > (not my idea): to have one connection (ex. GET method) for downstream, > and a second one opened permanently (PUT) or reopened for every > chunk of data (POST) for upstream. This uses twice much connections,
We thought about something like this too. There were two issues. 1. This would not work with the current Jabber server or MSN or Yahoo servers. 2. Would this work with the wide variety of HTTP proxies out there ? Regards, Ashvil _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
