For the good of all, may I ask that we do not mix-up different threads.
Regarding your problem, could you please send the <load main="jsm"> part of your jabber.xml Zad > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Riyaad Miller > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:08 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [JDEV] The Important Things > > > Hi Zadk > > strange one > any reason why when i do a registration against my ldap server it > actually pick up my ldap search and replies that the user already > exists (which is good as i'm trying to register a user that > already exists) but when i try and authenticate against my ldap - > it doesnt even communicate with the ldap server? > > your help and insight would be gr8 on this one > thx > - rm > > -----Original Message----- > From: zadk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:37 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [JDEV] The Important Things > > > > Although it would be beneficial, IMHO it can't really solve the problem of > farming one instant messenger domain. Since when one server goes dowmn the > users registered on that server will be left in the dark! Please > correct me > if I'm missing something > > Zad > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Al Sutton > > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:22 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [JDEV] The Important Things > > > > > > Jer has said the capability is pretty much there, so I think the next > > thing is try to put together a proof of concept. My C is rusty and my > > day job is hectic, so I'm unlikley to be able to do anything for a > > while, so if you want to get stuck in feel free. > > > > Al. > > > > On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 22:45, Tim Ferguson wrote: > > > I really, really like this idea, although I would not > consider myself an > > > expert yet I am willing to help out/move it along in this arena. > > > > > > Tim Ferguson > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > Behalf Of Al > > > Sutton > > > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:00 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [JDEV] The Important Things > > > > > > Why not add authentication and message relaying to the S2S protocol. > > > > > > This would give four advantages; > > > > > > 1. Any user could log into any machine and the server would relay the > > > authentication request to the relevant machine to handle > authentication. > > > > > > 2. The messages for that user would be relayed to the server they are > > > logged in to and then forwarded on to them. > > > > > > 3. Clusters or farms could be constructed to server a a single jabber > > > community and the load shared between them. > > > > > > 4. This would only involve a change to the S2S protol and servers > > > supporting it (of which there are few), and would leave the > C2S protocol > > > unchanged and thus not require any client changes. > > > > > > Comments? > > > > > > Al. > > > > > > On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 15:50, Ashvil wrote: > > > > > I found that we could use some kind of a gateway - > > > > > people connect to one server ( for example jabbber.org ) > > autheticate - > > > > > get a token/session id - and then continue with a server > > > > > l1.l4.dddljfds.jabbber.org that are real jabber servers. > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > Any ideas that can help in scalability are welcome. If we can > > use a pool > > > of > > > > cheap PCs to build a scalable jabber network, then even more > > valuable then > > > > having One big Server with Gigs of memory. > > > > > > > > This will require some changes in the Jabber protocol. The > > MSN protocol > > > does > > > > something like this, but takes this one step ahead by letting > > you connect > > > to > > > > any server in the pool, which then refers you to the right > > server that can > > > > authenticate you. If you make logging in a two-step process, > > you can solve > > > > this problem but that would mean changing all the Jabber > > clients and also > > > > the S2S communication in the Jabber server. > > > > > > > > Anyway, this is an area that the Jabber server developers > are the best > > > folks > > > > to comment on. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Ashvil > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > jdev mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > jdev mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > jdev mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > jdev mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > > > > _______________________________________________ > jdev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > _______________________________________________ > jdev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
