Iain Shigeoka wrote: > > What I would like to avoid is a reference implementation setting up > > the "standard" [*] . What I would like to see as much as possible is a > > written description of the part from the underlying spec (XML XMLNs, etc...) > > where there is an expected deviation in behaviour during processing. > > Excellent. I've been harping on this for a while.
me too... thanks, > I was arguing for rigorous standardization of > the existing Jabber protocols before doing anything else but was convinced > that things need changing (jabber next generation). excellent ... My last message was right about that issue : proper standardization of the protocol and rigorous specifications + documentations. > So from what I > understand, we're going to be creating the next generation protocols then > documenting... I'd be interested in discussing it further though. me too. In the standard jig ? or is there a doc-jig ? I know there is a dev-doc list, too... regards, Fr�d�rique _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
