On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 18:33, Julian Missig wrote: > A lot of people have been talking about all sorts of ways to do file > trasnfer. Before temas and I (and others) start working on making JEPs > out of the current file transfer implementations, I want to know what's > wrong with them. > > So my question is: What is wrong with the current HTTP/FTP OOB + PASS > solution? > > Currently the list is: > - limited to HTTP/FTP (need a better way to indicate protocols > supported, possibly browse?) > - PASS doesn't allow more permanent file caching > - lack of documentation > - lack of implementation
And before anyone says anything, by lack of implementation I mean that it's not extremely widely implemented, in fact I'm not aware of any PASS client implementations yet. However, jabber.org does have PASS support and some clients already do HTTP/FTP OOB. Julian -- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
