Hi,
I installed a Jabberd router (open source 1.4.2) on my linux machine
(redhat 7.2). I
download scm and installed in the same machine.
I first started the jabberd, then I tried to start scm by typing:
./scm 127.0.0.1 5222 1 scm guess
then I received the following error messages:
Router connection in error -- exiting
scm: Application.cpp:93: static void
bedrock::Application::stop(int, const std::string&): Assertion
'_app_instance_started == true' failed.
Any suggestions on how to fix it?
Thanks,
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 2:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: jdev digest, Vol 1 #1297 - 11 msgs
Send jdev mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of jdev digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Jabber Transports - New Architecture (Peter Saint-Andre)
2. Re: Yahoo With Jabber (Peter Saint-Andre)
3. Re: jabberd and Proxies (Dave)
4. RE: Yahoo With Jabber (Riyaad Miller)
5. Re: Jabber Transports - New Architecture (James Widman)
6. Re: Yahoo With Jabber (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Rodrigo_Borrego_Bernab=E9?=)
7. JECL and Address resolution (Piers Harding)
8. Re: question on running ECHO component (Piers Harding)
9. Re: jabberd and Proxies (Richard Dobson)
10. RE: Docs on the XDB element ?
(=?iso-8859-1?Q?Riviere_St=E9phane_Jean?=)
11. RE: jabberd and Proxies : leave AOL alone
(=?iso-8859-1?Q?Riviere_St=E9phane_Jean?=)
--__--__--
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 22:40:17 -0600 (CST)
From: Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JDEV] Jabber Transports - New Architecture
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7 Mar 2002, Julian Missig wrote:
> The transports were created to ease the transition to Jabber.
This to me is the most interesting point. What *else* can we do to ease
the transition? Given the recent changes by Yahoo and the fact that MSN
could change its protocol tomorrow on a whim (I won't even mention AOL), I
feel it's becoming obvious that the only way Jabber will have any impact
in the IM world is to grow fast enough and big enough that other IM
systems have to sit up and take notice. So what do we need to do in order
to grow that fast and become that ubiquitous?
Here's a short list:
1. Killer clients for Windows and Mac (face it, not everyone runs Linux ;)
2. Easier server administration to penetrate more organizations and ISPs
3. Windows server (see points 1 and 2)
4. Even better security
5. Reliable file transfers
6. Other popular features (even emoticon images, much as I dislike 'em)
I know people want immediate gratification and interoperability now, but I
say screw the transports -- let's build a truly open IM network, not spend
our precious energy hacking up gateways to closed systems.
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
email+jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
weblog: http://www.saint-andre.com/blog/
--__--__--
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 22:42:02 -0600 (CST)
From: Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [JDEV] Yahoo With Jabber
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Matthias Wimmer was kind enough to update the Yahoo tranport, which
> appears to be abandoned (sorry if I am wrong about this and offended
> the maintainer, but I have not noticed any updates in awhile).
Yes, it is abandoned.
Peter
--__--__--
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 00:04:34 -0500 (EST)
From: Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you control your firewall, that's great. If you're behind AOL's proxy,
though, you really need a crutch if you want to be able to run your own
server ;-)
- Dave
Thomas Muldowney wrote:
>
> I disagree. Jabber is another service that firewall admins should deal
> with appropiately. Tunnelling is a crutch and abuse of a good firewall
> setup, and I think should be avoided.
>
> --temas
>
>
> On Wed, 2002-03-06 at 14:43, Dave wrote:
> > Maybe we should set up some sort of HTTP-based s2s protocol? That'll
> > allow servers to talk to each other even when they're behind firewalls.
> > (HTTP-based c2s already exists.)
> >
> > Dave Cohen
> >
> >
> > =?iso-8859-1?Q?Riviere_St=E9phane_Jean?= wrote:
> > >
> > > The answer is : NO
> > >
> > > And a proxy would only allow outgoing connection (yourServer ->
> > > jabber.org:5269) but not the incoming one (jabber.org ->
yourServer:5269)
> > > s2s needs 2 simultanous TCP connection to work...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > De : Rodrigo Borrego Bernab� [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Envoy� : mercredi 6 mars 2002 15:06
> > > � : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Objet : Re: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> > >
> > >
> > > I can't open that port.
> > > So there is no way to say a jabber server it should use a proxy (maybe
with
> > > a tag in s2s description)?
> > >
> > > TIA
> > > Rodrigo
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Riviere St�phane Jean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:01 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't know if this has changed with the 1.4.2 server but it wasn't
> > > possible with the 1.4.1.
> > > You have to open the 5269 port on your firewall to enable s2s
> > > communication...
> > >
> > > St�phane.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > De : Rodrigo Borrego Bernab� [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Envoy� : mercredi 6 mars 2002 12:11
> > > � : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Objet : [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> > >
> > >
> > > Can a jabberd server work through a Proxy?
> > > I mean, I have my server compiled and working. Clients can connect,
users
> > > can talk (only users connected directly to my server), etc.
> > >
> > > But the server cannot find jabber.org. And it's because there's a
proxy
> > > between my server and the Internet.
> > > Could anybody help me? Thanks.
> > >
> > > Rodri
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > jdev mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > jdev mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > jdev mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > jdev mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jdev mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
>
--__--__--
Message: 4
Subject: RE: [JDEV] Yahoo With Jabber
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 09:00:49 +0200
From: "Riyaad Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've actually triedusing the transport mentioned is the link below
...followed the setup and readme and all
No such luck .... :-(
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JDEV] Yahoo With Jabber
Ajay:
I would try using the Yahoo! transport available at
http://amessage.de/patches/ rather than the one on the Jabber websites.
Matthias Wimmer was kind enough to update the Yahoo tranport, which
appears to be abandoned (sorry if I am wrong about this and offended
the maintainer, but I have not noticed any updates in awhile).
-matthew porter
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Ajay Garg wrote:
> i did whatever is wriiten on the website but i am still not able to
> make Yahoo work with my Jabber Server. Can someone please help me. I
> can send the Jabber log if required.
>
> Thanks
> -Ajay
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
> http://mail.yahoo.com/
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
>
_______________________________________________
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
�
Give your child an unfair advantage with M-Web Learning. To join, call
08600 32 000 or go to http://join.mweb.co.za
M-Web � just like that
--__--__--
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 01:08:28 -0600
From: James Widman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JDEV] Jabber Transports - New Architecture
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/me nods to the three previous replies.
The concept of null clients also gets raised during conversations like
this. That's a nice idea too, but not really necessary.
This is all you have to do:
1) If jabberd and the transports you want aren't known to work on your
platform, port them.
2) Configure jabberd so that the server's host name is localhost, and
transports are running at aim.localhost, msn.localhost, etc.
(I tested this part out and it works for me; contrary to the *current*
server howto, you don't need a Fully Qualified Domain Name to get
transport services like aim-t and msn-t working; you just need the
client to be on the same machine as the server if it's not an FQDN).
3) Use your client to log into localhost and register with the
transports from there.
The drawback here is that you@localhost cannot send messages to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] However, one feature that's been requested for clients
is the ability to be logged into multiple jabber accounts
simultaneously. As time goes on, this will probably become a pretty
common feature, especially as jabber becomes more popular and more
people request it (actually, if it's ok with Julian, and if enough
people email me in support of it, I'd be happy to work this into
Gabber). If and when it becomes a common feature, it could make a lot
of sense to put together a jabberd package which is optimized for use by
a small number of users and comes with the most popular inter-IM system
transports. Would that help to ease the transition for end users?
There's only one problem I can spot with a configuration like this:
the roster info for the localhost account will not follow you around
from one device to another. The user would have to manually do an
export/import. But there might be a clean way around this (if we're
going to have multiple accounts managed by one client, we might want a
clean way to store roster info on what the user designates as a
"primary" account anyway -- but *please* correct me if I'm wrong).
--James
--__--__--
Message: 6
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rodrigo_Borrego_Bernab=E9?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [JDEV] Yahoo With Jabber
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 08:40:34 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you and Peter for your help.
Rodri
----- Original Message -----
From: "Riviere St�phane Jean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- For libyahoo : [...]
--__--__--
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 07:57:42 +0000
From: Piers Harding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JDEV] JECL and Address resolution
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All,
I have just upgraded to the latest version of the JECL ( as found on
jabberstudio ), and noticed something different about how it opperates.
Previous I used to be able to use the name "localhost" for the server that
my components connected to, but now I am forced to use the IP address
127.0.0.1. I have traced this down to the Address Resolution phase in
bedrock Socket.cpp ( approx. line 123 ).
- I'm using RH7.2 gcc3.0.1.
Does anyone have any suggestions.
Cheers.
Piers Harding.
--__--__--
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 08:00:16 +0000
From: Piers Harding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JDEV] question on running ECHO component
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi - what is your build platform and where did you get your JECL source from
( jabberstudio or tigris.jabber.org ) ?
Cheers.
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 02:35:25PM -0800, Dong Yan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am new at Jabber and really appreciate your help. I installed a Jabber
> router in my linux machine and installed an echo program (as an
application,
> example of JECL) in the same machine.
>
> When I run the echo program, I always get the following message,
>
> Router error occurred.
> Router is now connected.
> Router is now disconnected.
>
> It seems to me something is wrong because of the error message at the
> first line. Any suggestions on how to fix it?
>
> Thanks,
> Don
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
--__--__--
Message: 9
From: "Richard Dobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 09:13:15 -0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well if you are using an AOL dialup connection to host a jabber server then
I think you have much greater problems to deal with anyway, also there is a
reason ISP's use such measures, so they can stop people hosting servers on
their connections when they shouldnt be in the first place, if you want to
host a server in such a situation change to an ISP that does not have the
aformentioned proxy servers.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 5:04 AM
Subject: Re: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> If you control your firewall, that's great. If you're behind AOL's proxy,
> though, you really need a crutch if you want to be able to run your own
> server ;-)
>
> - Dave
>
>
> Thomas Muldowney wrote:
> >
> > I disagree. Jabber is another service that firewall admins should deal
> > with appropiately. Tunnelling is a crutch and abuse of a good firewall
> > setup, and I think should be avoided.
> >
> > --temas
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2002-03-06 at 14:43, Dave wrote:
> > > Maybe we should set up some sort of HTTP-based s2s protocol? That'll
> > > allow servers to talk to each other even when they're behind
firewalls.
> > > (HTTP-based c2s already exists.)
> > >
> > > Dave Cohen
> > >
> > >
> > > =?iso-8859-1?Q?Riviere_St=E9phane_Jean?= wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The answer is : NO
> > > >
> > > > And a proxy would only allow outgoing connection (yourServer ->
> > > > jabber.org:5269) but not the incoming one (jabber.org ->
yourServer:5269)
> > > > s2s needs 2 simultanous TCP connection to work...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > > De : Rodrigo Borrego Bernab� [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Envoy� : mercredi 6 mars 2002 15:06
> > > > � : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Objet : Re: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I can't open that port.
> > > > So there is no way to say a jabber server it should use a proxy
(maybe with
> > > > a tag in s2s description)?
> > > >
> > > > TIA
> > > > Rodrigo
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Riviere St�phane Jean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:01 PM
> > > > Subject: RE: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I don't know if this has changed with the 1.4.2 server but it wasn't
> > > > possible with the 1.4.1.
> > > > You have to open the 5269 port on your firewall to enable s2s
> > > > communication...
> > > >
> > > > St�phane.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > > De : Rodrigo Borrego Bernab� [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Envoy� : mercredi 6 mars 2002 12:11
> > > > � : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Objet : [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Can a jabberd server work through a Proxy?
> > > > I mean, I have my server compiled and working. Clients can connect,
users
> > > > can talk (only users connected directly to my server), etc.
> > > >
> > > > But the server cannot find jabber.org. And it's because there's a
proxy
> > > > between my server and the Internet.
> > > > Could anybody help me? Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Rodri
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > jdev mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jdev mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
>
>
--__--__--
Message: 10
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Riviere_St=E9phane_Jean?=
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [JDEV] Docs on the XDB element ?
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:26:15 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
If anyone else is interested, I've written a working accept component using
Launcher.java.
I had to make some changes to make the thing work...
-> modify the main() of the Launcher to initialize all the launcher
properties
-> correct a few bugs in the ConnectionBean (pb with the
DisableAutoHeader...)
If others are interested, we can discuss of that here, but I think this
should be discussed OOB, to not disturb C developers with Java problems ;-)
Stephane.
------------------------------------------
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t�l : (0)3.20.60.77.14
Ing�nieur R&D
Equipe Grands Projets
Direction Recherche & D�veloppement
ATOS ORIGIN Activit� Multim�dia
http://www.atosorigin.com
-----Message d'origine-----
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoy� : jeudi 7 mars 2002 20:38
� : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [JDEV] Docs on the XDB element ?
You should take a look at the slides DJ Adams has posted from his talk at
FOSDEM.
http://www.pipetree.com/~dj/fosdem2002/
I'm also playing with java component based on jabberbeans. Did you try to
write an accept component based on Launcher.java? It's not working for me
but I'm about to fix that.
Philippe Raxhon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Riviere St�phane Jean wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently developing external server components (in Java) and need
to
store/retrieve some information about the component, registered
clients....
This can be done using the <XBD/> element, but I didn't find much
information but this :
http://docs.jabber.org/general/html/component-intro.html
Does further documentation about XDB exist or will I have to make
personal
tests to find how it works ?
Thanks for your help,
St�phane.
[ For those who are interested on my configuration :
- jabberd 1.4.1 with Conferencing / JUD / MSN Transport / Weather
service
;-)
- server is an old P2 300MHz / 92MB RAM running a RedHat 6.2
- external components are developed in Java with jabberbeans latest
CVS
sources
]
------------------------------------------
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t�l : (0)3.20.60.77.14
Ing�nieur R&D
Equipe Grands Projets
Direction Recherche & D�veloppement
ATOS ORIGIN Activit� Multim�dia
http://www.atosorigin.com
_______________________________________________
--__--__--
Message: 11
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Riviere_St=E9phane_Jean?=
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies : leave AOL alone
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:37:28 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's probably not the rigt place to deal about that, but can AOL call itself
an ISP ? What they offers is an access to the web (==port 80), not to the
whole Internet, all their other services are proprietary solutions....
So, if AOL is your provider, forget about all the wonderful things the
Internet can offer...
If you find Jabber great and have AOL as ISP, the only thing to do is find
another ISP !
I think that losing clients is the only thing that can make AOL understand
that their proprietary policy is not the right one...
Stephane.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Richard Dobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoy� : vendredi 8 mars 2002 10:13
� : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
Well if you are using an AOL dialup connection to host a jabber server then
I think you have much greater problems to deal with anyway, also there is a
reason ISP's use such measures, so they can stop people hosting servers on
their connections when they shouldnt be in the first place, if you want to
host a server in such a situation change to an ISP that does not have the
aformentioned proxy servers.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 5:04 AM
Subject: Re: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> If you control your firewall, that's great. If you're behind AOL's proxy,
> though, you really need a crutch if you want to be able to run your own
> server ;-)
>
> - Dave
>
>
> Thomas Muldowney wrote:
> >
> > I disagree. Jabber is another service that firewall admins should deal
> > with appropiately. Tunnelling is a crutch and abuse of a good firewall
> > setup, and I think should be avoided.
> >
> > --temas
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2002-03-06 at 14:43, Dave wrote:
> > > Maybe we should set up some sort of HTTP-based s2s protocol? That'll
> > > allow servers to talk to each other even when they're behind
firewalls.
> > > (HTTP-based c2s already exists.)
> > >
> > > Dave Cohen
> > >
> > >
> > > =?iso-8859-1?Q?Riviere_St=E9phane_Jean?= wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The answer is : NO
> > > >
> > > > And a proxy would only allow outgoing connection (yourServer ->
> > > > jabber.org:5269) but not the incoming one (jabber.org ->
yourServer:5269)
> > > > s2s needs 2 simultanous TCP connection to work...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > > De : Rodrigo Borrego Bernab� [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Envoy� : mercredi 6 mars 2002 15:06
> > > > � : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Objet : Re: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I can't open that port.
> > > > So there is no way to say a jabber server it should use a proxy
(maybe with
> > > > a tag in s2s description)?
> > > >
> > > > TIA
> > > > Rodrigo
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Riviere St�phane Jean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:01 PM
> > > > Subject: RE: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I don't know if this has changed with the 1.4.2 server but it wasn't
> > > > possible with the 1.4.1.
> > > > You have to open the 5269 port on your firewall to enable s2s
> > > > communication...
> > > >
> > > > St�phane.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > > De : Rodrigo Borrego Bernab� [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Envoy� : mercredi 6 mars 2002 12:11
> > > > � : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Objet : [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Can a jabberd server work through a Proxy?
> > > > I mean, I have my server compiled and working. Clients can connect,
users
> > > > can talk (only users connected directly to my server), etc.
> > > >
> > > > But the server cannot find jabber.org. And it's because there's a
proxy
> > > > between my server and the Internet.
> > > > Could anybody help me? Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Rodri
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > jdev mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jdev mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
>
>
_______________________________________________
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
--__--__--
_______________________________________________
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
End of jdev Digest
_______________________________________________
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
