> > Okay, it's a 2 vs. 1 here ... how about if one of you echoes _my_ > > messages instead of the other's? That should even things a bit ;-) > > > > - Dave > > If we're going to start counting here, you can put me down for another > one against
I'm a "for" :) > 1) I don't like html-ish tags being stuck directly in the message tag... > they're hard to filter out if you don't want them. If you want to do > this, do it in the xhtml tag where it is only dealt with by clients that > understand images. This sounds fine to me, doing it inside a xhtml tag. :) > 2) I don't like using filenames to identify an emotion. Some picture > that somebody thinks I want to see (maybe some nice porn) does not > necessarily convey an emotion to me. I want to learn what an image > means in my client. And I want my emoticons to have the same style and > a style that matches my UI. And I don't think sending relative paths in > the SRC attribute is a good solution to this... one client may not be > using .png files so why should it have to look for smiley.png as a key > to display it's happyface image? So why not use URN's? <img src="urn:jabber-emoticon:smilie.png" alt=":-)" /> Nothing is fetched from anywhere, clients have an internal table of emoticons. -- mummy, n.: An Egyptian who was pressed for time. _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
