Hmm ... that's a good point; I didn't think about the composing events with MSN-t before ... thanks for reminding me :-)
- Dave Julian Fitzell wrote: > > Richard Dobson wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Tijl Houtbeckers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:17 AM > > Subject: Re[2]: [JDEV] Emoticons: guidelines > > > > > >>And I'd love having a simple X > >>element telling that the current message should not be parsed for > > > > emoticons.. > > > > Which partly what my suggestion can do, so im not the only one then who > > thinks controlling emoticons using an x element is a good way to go about it > > :-) > > No, I very much agree with the principle of the idea, though I don't > care about the details of syntax, tag names, etc. > > I also think it *is* the job of a transport to make MSN users look as > much as possible like Jabber users. It's certainly trying to make > Jabber users look to MSN like MSN users. And it already transalates > "The user is replying..." messages into <x> tags. > > Julian > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Beta4 Productions (http://www.beta4.com) > > _______________________________________________ > jdev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
