hey! I am highly confused. I guess you are right. I tried it again and this time it sent the user\'s roster rather than the buddy\'s roster. The packet that came back was quite weird though..as the to and from jids did not get switched.. It looked like this..
Send: <iq type=\"get\" id=\"\" to=\"[EMAIL PROTECTED]\" from=\"[EMAIL PROTECTED]\"> <query xmlns=\"jabber:iq:roster\"/> </iq> Recv: <iq type=\'result\' id=\'\' to=\'[EMAIL PROTECTED]\' from=\'[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Winjab\'> <query xmlns=\'jabber:iq:roster\'><item jid=\'[EMAIL PROTECTED]\' name=\'cvsmsg\' subscription=\'both\'><group>My Resources</group></item><item jid=\'[EMAIL PROTECTED]\' name=\'ritu1\' subscription=\'both\'/></query></iq> Anyways, sorry for the inconvenience caused. No offenses please. Am still wondering why the \"to\" jid appears ritu@.. even though the packet came to veer@....?? Regards, Ritu Quoting Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > We have been developing and using Jabber for well over three years and no > one has ever seen or reported this behavior. Please provide a test case. > > Peter > > -- > Peter Saint-Andre > email+jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > weblog: http://www.saint-andre.com/blog/ > > Ritu Khetan wrote: > > > I just found out that it is possible for users to > > query each other rosters which would reveal the buddy > > list of the respective user. > > I feel this is highly unfavorable as people do not wish > > to share their buddy lists with others. > > Further, as rosters (esp. this part) are managed by the > > server, clients cannot afford to play with them by > > qualifying them by a private namespace. > > Are there any ideas on how we can take care of this? Is > > any work being done on this in the next version of Jabber? > > > _______________________________________________ > jdev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
