OK... DJ and I have hashed this out. His original reply seemed to me to say that IO::Select can_read() and the Jabber::Connection process() both behaved the same way. That's what I was trying to correct.
Sorry for the waste of bandwidth. DJ Adams wrote: > On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 11:09:25AM -0500, Ryan Eatmon wrote: > >>Uh.... I think you're wrong on that... >> > > Err, nope. But thanks for quoting the can_read() docu at me :-) > As I said, if you don't pass a value to process() it assumes 0. > Passing 0 to can_read isn't the same as passing nothing. > > dj > _______________________________________________ > jdev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
