On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 17:27, Jim Seymour wrote: > Thomas Muldowney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm remembering old conversations about this now, and the problem was > > that everything is just a JID and distinguishing tranports is a non > > trivial task (because they could be remote). > [snip] > > Reading this and the other follow-ups, it sounds like the only solution > to this problem, for now, is that instead of sending a presence type > invisible to the server, send it to each individual JID? Seems kind of > abusive to the server... > > Thanks, everybody, for the follow-ups.
No, send the invisible packet, then send it individually to the transports/users you want to see you as invisible. Julian _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
