Great, what does it mean? "The proposal was bad" or "we do not need avatars". Any other avatar developments?
-- Dr. Klaus H. Wolf bluehands GmbH & Co.mmunication KG http://www.bluehands.de/people/hw +49 (0721) 16108 75 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Julian Missig > Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 5:30 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JDEV] JEP-8 User Avatars in Jabber > > > Despite what the "Status" field says, JEP-0008 was rejected. > > On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 11:16, Klaus H. Wolf wrote: > > Hi, > > > > is JEP-8 still considered active? > > Is it worth discussing and worth as a guideline? > > > > If yes, here the comment: > > - JEP-8 proposes 2 methods for retrieving the avatar data: > client-client and > > client-storage > > - it prefers client-client > > - I discovered the following behaviour: if the client changes > the avatar, > > then many other clients request the new data, and the server > throttles the > > connection because of e.g. 10 x 5 KB. > > > > Solution: > > - prefer client-storage over client-client. > > - if the client gets a request then it knows it must submit to > the storage > > to avoid further requests. > > > > Regards > > -- > > Dr. Klaus H. Wolf > > bluehands GmbH & Co.mmunication KG > > http://www.bluehands.de/people/hw > > +49 (0721) 16108 75 > > > _______________________________________________ > jdev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
