Dalton, I'm also interested in maintaining JabberBeans. Are there any features of JabberStudio that would be lacking on SF? I would say stick with SF.
I have been writing documentation for myself about JabberBeans for a long while, and would be happy to help you. jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am very excited that there is renewed interest in the jabberbeans > package. Last week I talked to the most recent developer on the > project, Shawn, about me making some changes to the project. I am in > the process of fixing the documentation-- I want to add more code > samples etc. to the API as well as update it to include his new classes. > Are other people besides me interested in maintaining jabberbeans? > I advocate leaving the project on sourceforge and merging all of new > the changes, as well as a substantial revision of documentation. > > Anyone interested? What do you think? > > -Dalton > > BTW Jean-Louis, can I get a copy of the new code? > _______________________________________________ > jdev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > > . > _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
