I agree somewhat with Edrin, if his preferred informations could be merged into a table i appreciate it.
Especially dependencies are something which can be very annoying if you don't have the desired libs either because one uses an old linux kernel or because one is suddenly at home with no internetconnection. my two cent, ulrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I don�t think this is a good idea... > In fact each coder is always convinced that his code is > beta/alpha/released... whatever other ppl would call it different (for > example all ppl are using alpha/beta icq clients and that is their > released product) > > I personally prefere plain descriptions, meaning: how many > dependencies, environment (OS, c++/vb), license, url, project time. > > cya, Edrin > > > We should probably add also another column specifying the "completeness" of > > the component, either textual (alpha, beta, release candidate, reliable for > > production environment), or a % value. Of course these would have to be > > submitted by the author, who will take his responsibility :-) for telling > > the truth!!! > > _______________________________________________ > jdev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
