On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 09:46, Arjan Peddemors wrote: > We had two main reasons for having the location element at the > same level as the presence element. First, we are considering > presence and location (and many other types of information) as > independent parameters that define the context of a user (or > other non-human entity). Second, we want the user to control > the distribution of his/her context information in a flexible > manner: the user must be able to allow subscription to this > information an a per-item basis. This means that subscription > to presence and location, although essentially based on the > same mechanism, is completely independent.
Personally, I'm curious why these goals couldn't be fit into a properly namespaced child element of the message packet. Could you try to elaborate on this some? -- Jeremy Nickurak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
