-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> With HTML(-only) mails it is something different. It is not necessary >> to support HTML to be MIME compliant and enabling HTML display in your >> mail reader also has some drawbacks if you want to fight spam. > > Absolutely. Comparing HTML mail and PGP MIME support is a case of > apples and oranges. They are most certainly not the same type of thing.
I'm aware of that. My point was just that if we were going to tell people to avoid HTML e-mail for the sake of the list recipients (which, as I'm fairly sure folks on the list aren't sending spam, scripts and virii, was my understanding on the reasoning; i.e., a 'make the list legible for the lowest common denominator'), it's fair for a similar request to be made that PGP signatures be done in armored ASCII for the same reason. Mea culpa if I misunderstood the justification. :) - -- Rachel Blackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Trillian Messenger - http://www.trillian.cc/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQE+7krDzxcwfH0qMicRAgxvAJ943Z05D987CIcxg4U8fHRiKp7GkwCghrlV d/0Ja1fS8txhYsR2SudKN+E= =15mp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
