No, I actually did mean don't. Most protocol enhancements will not require any direct participation by the server, so you could use a generic jabberd. Your requirement of using windows on your server, however, means that you are likely to need to modify jabberd to get the kind of performance you are going to need. Of course if you do need the server to do something special then jabberd may still be the best option...

Tim Anderson wrote:

<quote>
Depending on what you are doing, you may not need server support. If you
<b>don't</b> then your best bet is probably to take a copy of the Jabberd
source (which I think builds under cygwin, although windows is not a
supported platform) and tidy it up so that it runs nicely under
cygwin/mingw.
</quote>

I think you meant if I <b>DO</b> need server support, or have I strangely
awoke in a Lewis Carroll novel?

And yes, I do need a server for deployment somewhere internally for the half
baked idea I have that uses jabber.

I think I'll blow the $400 to go to the jabber bootcamp since I live in
Portland and the open source thing convention center is just a train ride
away...

Tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev





_______________________________________________
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev

Reply via email to