On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 08:33:40AM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote: > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 04:52:48PM -0400, Daniel Chote wrote: > > level of relativity you should keep. For instance... if I am holding a > > conversation with someone, who also supports jabber:x:events, and the > > messages that are going back and forward between the two users have > > attrib type="chat" in them, shouldnt the events hold the same attribute > > type="chat"? > > IMHO this should be a MUST - this would make some (eg. plugin-based) > implementations much easier - those where chat session is handled by > different object than "normal" messages.
JEP-0022 is informational. JEP-0085 is a standards-track replacement for JEP-0022, and it includes this restriction. JEP-0022 will not. However, someone could write a standards-track revision of JEP-0022 if desired. Either way, we need to settle on one method and do it. I'm biased since I'm a co-author of JEP-0085. :P Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre Jabber Software Foundation http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.php _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
