Re: [JDEV] Re: jabber; what would you like to see?

[Ulrich B. Staudinger]

Jacek Konieczny wrote:

On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 02:33:36PM +0200, Ulrich B. Staudinger wrote:
 

developers keep complaining about this "error in the DTD", at least in 
their understanding - which i can understand, too. The error is for sure 
not the coffe:stats namespace (which i want to see written down in a 
formal JEP),  it's the lack of subelements of query in iq-get.
   

There is no element "query" in jabber:client namespace. In any different
name space it is different element. DTD describing "query" element in
one namespace tells nothing about "query" element in other namespace the
same way DTD element definition for "query" element doesn't describe
"iq" element.
true, i didn't check the DTD before, too. In fact i didn't ever really 
check the DTD cause when i started i used some other documents ....

Anyway, if you can't remember, i still can remember several discussions 
about this topic. Ok, maybe it is the jabber server not letting those IQ 
tags (with no query) pass.

<iq type='set' to='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'>
<test/>
</iq>
<iq from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" type="error" to="[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Psi" >
<test/>
<error code="503" >Service Unavailable</error>
</iq>
Anyway, the DTD speaks different about the iq tag. it says:
<!ELEMENT iq (#PCDATA)>
 
   <!ATTLIST iq
     to CDATA #IMPLIED
     from CDATA #IMPLIED
     id CDATA #IMPLIED
     type (
       get | 
       set | 
       result | 
       error
     ) #IMPLIED
   >

thus, if you send 
<iq from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" type="error" to="[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Psi" >
PARAMETER_IN_NO_XML
</iq>

it'll get through. 

ulrich
--
Ulrich B. Staudinger
http://www.die-horde.de
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jid: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
current project: REDHORN
http://redhorn.sourceforge.net
Blog: http://jabber.linux.it/jogger/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
jdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev