I gmane.network.jabber.devel, skrev Ulrich B. Staudinger: > > It's not a bad idea anyway to use UDP for voice data in a lot of cases, > > even if you're in conference mode. > > UDP is ok if it works. Anyway there must be a central server to solve > all those other issues. The discussion's not about UDP or TCP it's about > P2P or central server. and p2p is simply not practical - due to > encoding/decoding delays, traffic restrictions on client side, etc.
First.. it is not me who have written the document.. It seems like this is what Skype does to establish a stream. I would prefer if this could be done in colaporation with the central Jabber server, which could be used to exchange the portnumbers, etc. I have by now no idea of the success rate.. but I really think that transferring the streams over the central server should be the last available option. -- ./Jesper Krogh, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T�m din hjerne for Linuxviden p� http://www.linuxwiki.dk _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
