On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 10:39:46AM +1100, Robert Norris wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:21:29PM +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote: > > m?n 2003-12-01 klockan 19.05 skrev Peter Saint-Andre: > > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 06:23:16PM +0100, Magnus Henoch wrote: > > > > XMPP IM states in section 11.3 that a resource with a negative > > > > priority will not receive message or presence stanzas. What will > > > > happen to those stanzas instead? > > > > > > > > For example, if a client sets negative priority when the user is away, > > > > will it receive notification of accumulated presence changes when it > > > > sets a positive priority again, and similarly for messages? Or is it > > > > simply a bad idea to rely on such behavior? > > > > > > Those stanzas get sent to /dev/null -- if you don't like that behavior, > > > don't set your presence to a negative number. ;-) This functionality is > > > mainly for non-chat nodes, rather than normal IM clients. > > > > Oh :((( I had really been waiting for this in the servers since it would > > make it possible to not have messages delivered to clients that are > > away. > > XMPP-IM-20 (not out yet, see the "ietf" module in JabberStudio CVS) has > been updated. Messages will only be delivered to a client that has sent > negative presence if the message is explicitly addressed to their > resource - ie, they won't receive messages addressed to the user. > > However, presence changes will go to all available sessions, as before. > If it wasn't this way, then there'd be little point having negative > presence - you might as well just not send it.
Yes, sorry, that was an overzealous copy-and-paste on my part. FYI, there won't really be a draft-ietf-xmpp-im-20, since these little corrections I'm making will probably just count as modifications submitted under "Author's 48 Hours" when I get to do a final check on the docs before they become RFCs. Peter _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
