> I take your point regarding a 'transport'. Good
> But I think that we're circling the same basic idea ;) Kind of, although I think a flash proxy would be far more useful than a CCM component, otherwise flash components are forced to use only the jabber server hosted at the same ip address / domain that the flash app came from. IMO it is far better to develop the proxy first then possibly the CCM component second if people really see a need for it, IMO the proxy maybe all thats required to get things working. > So I'm guessing that JECL would be an appropriate > framework for developing these ? Possibly > Is the current jabber.org CCM based on JECL ? I dont think so. Richard _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
