Yes, I see the point now. XMLSocket is limited to ports above 1024, so this is another added benefit as well
Not anymore since player 7.0.19:
http://www.powersdk.com/ted/2004_02_01_archive.php#107581266010365014
This is of interest for me...Anyway, I m not sure that I can be of any help concerning implementationIt seems to me that, if we were to try to make this a generalized proxy for other clients besides Flash, we will still have to deal with the minor issue of determining if it is a Flash client (or any other client that appends a zero-byte to outgoing data) and if so, handling it accordingly. I personally would like to see it generalized as well, so that it can be of the greatest benefit to the community.
Now, the question is: Who, besides me, would like to continue the planning
phase and see this thing to fruition? I'd imagine we should take the
details of it all off-list at some point. I'll gladly organize the effort
if need be, but I acknowledge that my technical skills on the server side
are a bit lacking for me to implement a working version on my own.
as my server side skills are quite limited too.
A formalized publicly available document or JEP outlining the proxyYes, this of course seems to be the best solution, and I m willing to help in discussions.
control protocol and the details of it all would of course be best -
allowing the open source community to have it's own implementation and
independent commercial vendors to have perhaps implementations that they
can bundle with their servers.
Johann
- Sean _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
_______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
