Rob, Thanks for replying.
On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 16:16, Robert Norris wrote: > > Does returning mod_PASS mean that my iq queries with > > xnlns='jabber:iq:private' will be routed to my custom client? > > It looks like j2 will pass it on to the client, thats correct. Whether > it should is another story - I think the results of such an action > (using a predefined namespace in a non-standard way) is undefined at > best. I'm not actually using the predefined namespace in a non-standard way. I'm implementing a private data store for my non-IM clients with additional features above those offered by jabberd. I'd like to do that with a standard server (without modifying the source code). If jabberd v2 passes my iq packets on to clients, then the developers have properly implemented JEP-0049. If a 'to' attribute exists then the server should honor it. In v1.4.3, I don't know why this namespace is handled like a special case. > > ps. I want to use the jabber:iq:private namespace for my app instead > > of developing a new one that does the same thing. > > If you want to guarantee that it works correctly everywhere, use a > custom namespace. There's no need to 're-invent the wheel' here. Rob thanks for replying on the return mod_PASS question. I'll get jabberd2 running and get back to coding. Craig -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Dr. Craig Hollabaugh, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Author of Embedded Linux: Hardware, Software and Interfacing www.embeddedlinuxinterfacing.com _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
