See spec at: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/
> How does SVG deal with embedded pixmaps? I think that the ability to insert a > screen capture in the whiteboard is essential. > > > On Sunday 06 June 2004 10:54, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > > Agree completely. As said before, the subset of SVG called Tiny SVG (SVGT) > > is the more likely candidate. No need to invent one ourselves. > > BUT, even SVGT is really large, and a complete implementation very > > demanding. SVG is, of course, targeted to static documents, which means > > they can do editing on the xml document itself. We cannot do that since we > > only have a stream of xml floating back and forth. This introduces a number > > of complications, editing commands, synchronization etc. > > The actual drawing is handled with SVG(T), but we need to add extra > > elements for editing at least. Also, every element must be uniquely > > identifiable, so we need to add an id tag. And the synchronization... > > > > Also, SVG doesn't add any default bindings to elements, but they all have > > to be defined in the document using scripts, like moving and other > > editing... We, on the other hand, already know we have a drawing tool, and > > therefore expects some standard bindings for moving, scaling etc. > > Only if some nonstandard bindings are necessary for particular > > functionality, additional scripts must be supplied. This raises more > > questions usw... > > > > There are no newlines in SVG, but we expect to have multiline text. > > Problems. > > > > Well, just some thoughts. If someone is willing to put some effort into > > this, I'm willing to continue with my experimental implementation in > > the Coccinella client. > > > > Mats > > > > > On Fri, 4 Jun 2004 05:15, Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > is there any active whiteboard JEP?... I found out that JEP-10 was such > > > > a JEP, but was obsoleted (?). Any effort in this sense, apart from > > > > Coccinella?. > > > > > > There was one other client (Neos) which had implemented Whiteboarding (so > > > perhaps some effort towards standardisation wouldn't be a bad idea, now > > > that there are at least two working clients...) _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
