On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 09:33:31AM -0400, Bob Wyman wrote: > Ralph Meijer wrote: > > Pubsub.com as far as I can see, is tailored to the > > pubsub.com application, and not a generic pubsub > > service anyone can use for their own applications > > (Bob, correct me if I'm wrong). > It is not our intention to build a pubsub service that is in any > way non-standard -- in anything other then the implementation. > > [...] > > Anyway, we're trying hard to make sure that our service conforms > to all applicable standards. It won't do us any good to have a custom > system that implements protocols incorrectly...
Ah, sure. I meant you are indeed (aiming to be) compliant to JEP-0060 as a protocol, but that the behaviour is taylored to your specific use. You explained that nicely by the way, and I think this is how the JEP should be used. I my view, generic pubsub services will be one part of the spectrum, mainly for deployment alongside public Jabber servers. They'd offer a way create nodes for applications like User Mood, Avatars, etc. On the other end there should (and will) be application specific implementations (like pubsub.com, lli.jabberstudio.org, and a future version of Mimir). I like this. A lot. -- Groetjes, Ralphm _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
