On Wednesday 11 August 2004 11:15 am, JD Conley wrote: > the remote server. Thus, something like the proposed ping protocol > would be required, not just a connection attempt. I've spent a great > deal of time thinking about how to best fix this issue in our server and > have come to the same conclusions as Justin.
Unfortunately, 4 out of 5 council members have already objected to the JEP on the council mailing list. This is probably some sort of record. The only hold-out is rob, who told me this morning that he needs to read up on JEP-79 (AMP) before he can form an opinion. That said, would it hurt for the council to write to the public standards-jig so we can have an actual discussion? Better yet, can they _read_ it also? It's not like this is a new topic, and we even have an active thread going. -Justin _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
