> them? Let's do it right the first time, please. I think this is one of the major problems with the way Jabber is going right now. If we do this 'the right way', it will take year(s) until it is actually approved, implemented, and active. And without better transport handling, i really don't see other people of the masses use Jabber for their daily use. This is a minor change to clients and transports, which breaks nothing, and which could improve user experience a lot. Removing the feature when a better protocol arrives should be peanuts.
Don't get me wrong, i also want to do this right the first time. I just lost my faith in the whole process of approving and getting protocols active in Jabber. Although it is a very extensible protocol, it always seems to me that it will still take years before Jabber is really active, and who knows, it might be leaping behind on other IM services by then. Just my 2 cents. cheers, Remko _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
